April 20, 1997
By JAMES VESCOVI
|
COOK
& PEARY
The Polar
Controversy Resolved.
By
Robert M. Bryce.
Stackpole,
$50.
|
ho discovered the
North Pole? The question, as old as the claims themselves, is
re-examined
by Robert M. Bryce, a research librarian at Montgomery College in
Maryland.
''Cook & Peary'' comprises biographies of Robert E. Peary
(holder of
the prize in most history books) and Frederick A. Cook, and an analysis
of their claims. Until their fight over discovery of the North Pole,
the
fellow explorers enjoyed cordial relations. A doctor from Brooklyn,
Cook
treated Peary's broken leg during an expedition to Greenland in 1891.
He
later achieved his own celebrity, saving an Antarctic expedition from
scurvy
by persuading members to eat raw penguin meat. But his star began to
fade
in 1906, with his claim to be the first man to ascend Mount McKinley,
now
definitively refuted by Mr. Bryce's meticulous scrutiny of Cook's bogus
''summit'' photographs. In 1908, Cook, with two Eskimos, made a dash
for
the North Pole, which he said he reached in April, a year before Peary.
Peary, himself on his final attempt, roared back to civilization and,
backed
by affluent and well-connected supporters, won the battle, at least
temporarily.
His claim, challenged by Mr. Bryce and others, now seems fraudulent.
Mr.
Bryce also demolishes Cook's evidence. Not only was he inept at making
celestial calculations, but a copy of his polar diary (the original is
lost), unearthed in Denmark by Mr. Bryce, shows erasures and
inconsistencies.
Mr. Bryce's zeal to leave no stone unturned (130 pages of footnotes)
hurts
his book: he sometimes gets mired in too much detail. Nevertheless, he
has made a leap forward in resolving the North Pole question.
Copyright 1997 The New York Times Company
|
|